| (Anonymous) |
| 2004-12-27 10:40 (UTC) |
| Blacklisting is effective |
Blacklisting is actually a very effective way to stop spam; it's just important that it is set up correctly and an accurate set of blocks are used. There are dozens of sets of blocks out there - as you say some block (tons) of legitimate mail, but they do however generally stop a great deal of spam.
I currently use spamhaus.org's block list, which as I am aware has a very low false positive rate, but blocks several dozen spam a day for me. For the few positives (1 a year) I have a webmail form in the bounced email for the user to contact me.
The fact that you get a bounce with DNS blacklisting is the great thing about DNS blacklisting - at least you know you've been identified as junk. With other methods of stopping spam - a junk mail folder - you don't know you've ended up there.
Like I say though (as with anything) it is important it is used correctly. That includes taking off false positives quickly, and having careful methods as to how IP addresses get on the lists, and this is all down to the provider of the list.
Challenge/response systems are a nice idea, but they also have the own set of problems. See http://www.politechbot.com/p-04746.html (http://www.politechbot.com/p-04746.html).
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link